Spacer KodakSpacerShare Moments. Share Life. Sunday, February 12 Spacer
spacer
2003 PROXY STATEMENT: PROPOSALS TO BE VOTED ON PAGE 2 OF 6 left arrow right arrow

Statement of Support: As long-term shareholders of the Company, we support executive compensation policies and practices that provide challenging performance objectives and serve to motivate executives to achieve long-term corporate value maximization goals. While salaries and bonuses compensate management for short-term results, the grant of stock and stock options has become the primary vehicle for focusing management on achieving long-term results. Unfortunately, stock option grants can and do often provide levels of compensation well beyond those merited. We believe it has become abundantly clear that stock option grants without specific performance-based targets often reward executives for stock price increases due solely to a general stock market rise, rather than to extraordinary company performance.

This resolution advocates performance-based stock options. It defines performance-based stock options as indexed options whose exercise price moves with an appropriate peer group index composed of a company's primary competitors. It should be noted that there are other forms of indexed options that use other types of market indices. The resolution requests that the Company's Board ensure that future Company stock option plans link the options exercise price to an industry performance index associated with a peer group of companies selected by the Board, such as those companies used in the Company's proxy statement to compare 5 year stock price performance.

Implementing an indexed stock option plan would mean that our Company's participating executives would receive payouts only if the Company's stock price performance was better than that of the peer group average. By tying the exercise price to a market index, indexed options reward participating executives for outperforming the competition. Indexed options would have value when our Company's stock price rises in excess of its peer group average or declines less than its peer group average stock price decline. By downwardly adjusting the exercise price of the option during a downturn in the industry, indexed options remove pressure to reprice stock options.

At present, stock options granted by the Company are not indexed to peer group performance standards. As long-term owners, we feel strongly that our Company would benefit from the implementation of a stock option program that rewarded superior long-term corporate performance. In response to strong negative public and shareholder reactions to the excessive financial rewards provided executives by non-performance based option plans, a growing number of shareholder organizations, executive compensation experts, and companies are supporting the implementation of performance-based stock option plans such as that advocated in this resolution. We urge your support for this important governance reform."

The Board of Directors recommends a vote AGAINST this proposal for the following reasons:

The Company's current stock option plan (the 2000 Omnibus Long-Term Compensation Plan) was approved by the shareholders at the 1999 Annual Meeting. Like all of the Company's executive compensation programs, this plan is overseen by the Executive Compensation and Development Committee of the Board of Directors (the "Committee"). Under this plan's management stock option program, options are awarded to participating employees based in large part on their performance potential. Management recommends grant levels for each of the Company's executive officers, subject to review and approval by the Committee. Options are priced at 100% of the fair market value of the Company's stock on the day of grant.

The Company believes this program aligns its executives with the other owners of the Company and provides its executives with the necessary incentives, while still linking their awards to their performance. The proposed plan, tying an option's exercise price to an industry peer group stock performance index, is both unnecessary and unworkable.

An indexed options plan is unnecessary because the Company's current plan works well. The current plan does not require that executives receive option awards at specific levels. Under the plan management uses external survey data to set suggested award ranges for different levels of executives, but reserves substantial discretion as to the size of awards within, above or beneath these ranges, based on performance potential. Individual performance with a substantial positive impact on corporate results can be rewarded, and distinguished from less superior performance.

spacer
spacer
2003 PROXY STATEMENT: PROPOSALS TO BE VOTED ON PAGE 2 OF 6 left arrow right arrow