|
Stock Options
Effective November 22, 2002, the Committee granted a stock option award to Mr. Carp of 175,000 shares. These options were granted
under the same terms and conditions as awards made to all executives generally under the Company's management stock option
program. Mr. Carp's award was approved by the Committee based on its review of benchmark data and assessment of the contributions
Mr. Carp has made, and continues to make, to the Company.
Performance Stock Program
Based on the Company's financial performance over the three-year period ending in 2002, Mr. Carp did not receive an award for the
2000-2002 performance cycle. As reported previously, Mr. Carp did receive an interim award under the Executive Incentive Plan, a
special program established under the 2002-2004 performance cycle. The interim award earned by Mr. Carp is listed under the column
entitled "Restricted Stock Awards" in the Summary Compensation Table on page 96.
Restricted Stock Unit Award
In November 2002, the Company approved a retention-based award to Mr. Carp consisting of restricted stock units corresponding to
100,000 shares of common stock. Effective December 2, 2002, 75,000 of these units were awarded; the remaining 25,000 units were
awarded effective January 1, 2003. All of the units vest on the third anniversary of the date of grant, but payment for the units may
not be received before the fourth anniversary of the date of grant. The award is listed in the Summary Compensation Table on page 96
under the column entitled "Restricted Stock Awards."
COMPANY POLICY ON QUALIFYING COMPENSATION
Under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, the Company may not deduct certain forms of compensation in excess of
$1,000,000 paid to any of the named executive officers that are employed by the Company at year-end. The Committee believes that it
is generally in the Company's best interests to have compensation be deductible under Section 162(m). The Committee also feels,
however, that there may be circumstances in which the Company's interests are best served by maintaining flexibility regardless of
whether compensation is fully deductible under Section 162(m).
- Richard S. Braddock, Chair
- Timothy M. Donahue
- Durk I. Jager
- Hector de J. Ruiz
|